Housing busts may lower household mobility

October 21st, 2008

Stuck!.bmp
If you can't sell, you can't move. Makes sense, right? Now some economists have proven that in a housing bust, people with negative equity in their homes are about 50% less likely to move than people with positive equity in their homes. The work is by Fernando Ferreira and Joseph Gyourko of Wharton and Joseph Tracy of the New York Fed. Here's a quote from a digest of their paper by the National Bureau of Economic Research:

In a weak housing market, it seems, households get 'locked in' to their homes and are prevented from 'moving up' to larger homes and better neighborhoods.

That finding is not as obvious as it might seem. In fact, you could argue the opposite--that household mobility would actually increase in a housing bust because people have to move when they lose their houses to foreclosure. Some of that occurs, obviously, but it's overwhelmed by the lock-in effect, the economists found.

Some other tidbits: Household mobility is higher if you're divorced, or highly educated, or white, or a male-headed household, or very young, or very old, or have few children.

Decreased mobility tends to be a bad thing. It means people get stuck in weak labor markets. They may also do less maintenance and investment in their homes.

Hot Property

Entry Filed under: News

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Enter the following characters/numbers into the box below, please!
Sample verification

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Search

Latest Posts

Calendar

May 2012
M T W T F S S
« Apr    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Posts by Month


Most Recent Posts

Posts by Category

Syndication

Powered By