From the Cleveland Fed: Ten myths about subprime mortgages

July 22nd, 2009

Demyanyk.png
Yuliya Demyanyk, a senior research economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, has just written an article called "Ten myths about subprime mortgages." I don't buy everything she says. For one thing, I think the piece leaves the impression that subprime mortgages weren't a big problem. Clearly they were. Still, the piece makes for interesting reading. Here's a synopsis of her "myths":

Myth 1: Subprime mortgages went only
to borrowers with impaired credit

Myth 2: Subprime mortgages promoted homeownership

Myth 3: Declines in home values caused
the subprime crisis in the United States

Myth 4: Declines in mortgage underwriting standards
triggered the subprime crisis

Myth 5: Subprime mortgages failed
because people used homes as ATMs

Myth 6: Subprime mortgages failed
because of mortgage rate resets

Myth 7: Subprime borrowers with hybrid mortgages
were offered (low) “teaser rates”

Myth 8: The subprime mortgage crisis in the United States
was totally unexpected

Myth 9: The subprime mortgage crisis in the United States
is unique in its origins

Myth 10: The subprime mortgage market was
too small to cause big problems

Hot Property - BusinessWeek

Entry Filed under: News

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Enter the following characters/numbers into the box below, please!
Sample verification

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Search

Latest Posts

Calendar

May 2012
M T W T F S S
« Apr    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Posts by Month


Most Recent Posts

Posts by Category

Syndication

Powered By