From the Cleveland Fed: Ten myths about subprime mortgages
July 22nd, 2009

Yuliya Demyanyk, a senior research economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, has just written an article called "Ten myths about subprime mortgages." I don't buy everything she says. For one thing, I think the piece leaves the impression that subprime mortgages weren't a big problem. Clearly they were. Still, the piece makes for interesting reading. Here's a synopsis of her "myths":
Myth 1: Subprime mortgages went only
to borrowers with impaired credit
Myth 2: Subprime mortgages promoted homeownership
Myth 3: Declines in home values caused
the subprime crisis in the United States
Myth 4: Declines in mortgage underwriting standards
triggered the subprime crisis
Myth 5: Subprime mortgages failed
because people used homes as ATMs
Myth 6: Subprime mortgages failed
because of mortgage rate resets
Myth 7: Subprime borrowers with hybrid mortgages
were offered (low) “teaser rates”
Myth 8: The subprime mortgage crisis in the United States
was totally unexpected
Myth 9: The subprime mortgage crisis in the United States
is unique in its origins
Myth 10: The subprime mortgage market was
too small to cause big problems
Entry Filed under: News
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed